Publication | BRG
CECL Reserving and Credit Benchmarking Quarterly Study | Q2 2021
Paul Noring, John DelPonti, and Joe Sergienko
COVID-19’s adverse impact on loan performance and current Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act financial reporting and disclosure relief arrived simultaneous to the implementation of the controversial Current Expected Credit Losses (CECL) accounting standard for loan-loss reserving. Analysis and comparisons would have been difficult under any circumstances. However, the interplay of all three factors has made analyzing bank loan performance and reserving levels even more difficult over the last year and a half.
In a continuing effort to provide financial statement preparers and users more insightful information to benchmark activity better across a representative cross-section of banks (given asset size, geographic location, and business mix), BRG’s Financial Institution Advisory practice created the quarterly CECL Reserving and Credit Benchmarking Study. The study compares allowance levels, charge-offs, nonperforming loans (based on CARES Act classification/reporting relief), and other key credit metrics across multiple predominately domestic US banking institutions.
This fifth study in our series continues to analyze eleven representative banks that appeared in our first four studies. These banks have total assets as of June 30, 2021, ranging from $29 billion to $554 billion (and a $162 billion median).